How to Cite
Abstract
Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and foliaceus (PF) are classified as rare autoimmune blistering disorders in which IgG antibodies destroy desmosome proteins desmoglein 1 and desmoglein 3 within the stratum spinosum of the epithelial layer of the skin. These disorders once used to be a fatal condition, but the advent of steroids and immunosuppressants has made these diseases manageable. Such treatments, however, only alleviate symptoms and have not been viable in allowing patients to achieve prolonged steroid-free remission. In 2018, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab as the first-line treatment for moderate to severe cases of pemphigus. While rituximab has been generally successful in treating this disease and has led to prolonged steroid-free remission in many patients, treatment disparities and differences in patient outcomes due to social determinants of health have not yet been studied in the context of PV and PF. Such studies have already been conducted with more common dermatological disorders such as hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), which show significant evidence of outcome disparities due to social factors such as race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status. However, such studies have yet to be conducted with pemphigus likely because of how rare the disease is and because the current first-line treatment was FDA approved recently in 2018. The aim of this study is to conduct a retrospective multivariable analysis of 100 patients with pemphigus from UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland County Hopital to determine which social factors are the most responsible for any discovered pemphigus treatment outcome disparities. The impacts of this study are far-reaching as any discovered disparities can alert dermatologists to place a special emphasis to address any social factors that may play a role in leading to treatment outcome differences for patients with pemphigus.